 |
 | By Muhammad Zafrulla Khan This concisely written text presents the teachings of Islam and their distinct superiority over various Articles that make up the Declaration of Human Rights adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations and universally acclaimed as the greater charter of freedom. The author explains how 1400 years ago, Islam emancipated the poor and oppressed and gave the world the basic prescription for the respect and value of all human beings irrespective of class, colour or creed. Those instructions contained in the Holy Qur'an remain as relevant today as they were at the time that it was revealed. However, with the passage of time, some parts of Muslim society neglected Qur'anic teachings with an inevitable decline in moral standards. The author however concludes on an optimistic note that the revival of Islam is happening and with it a close adherence to the values laid out in the Holy Qur'an US$7.00 [ Order] |
 | Divine Manifestations (Tajalliyat-e-illahiyyah) is an unfinished book of The Promised Messiahas, written in 1906 and published posthumously in 1922. The book covers important subjects of divine knowledge and spiritual insight. It opens with an account of the precision with which the Promised Messiah's prophecies regarding earthquakes had been fulfilled, and foretells the coming of five more terrible catastrophes. In this context, Haduras also explains the philosohopy behind divine chastisement. US$6.00 [ Order] |
| By Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian, The Promised Messiah and Mahdi, Founder of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Jama'at. Darurat-ul-Imam, or The Need for the Imam, spells out in depth the urgency and need for the Imam of the age, and his qualities and hallmarks as the Divinely appointed guide, the voice articulate of the age, and the constant recipient of Divine revelations, and how all these qualities are fully present in the person of the holy author. US$7.00 [ Order] |
|
 |

Report on the Situation of Ahmadi Muslims in Pakistan |
|
 WEDDING CARD CASE 
|
Our patience has reached its limits and we are only tolerating these people in this country |
Mr Farooq Haider, Additional Advocate General |
|
The following case is a typical example of the cases that have been brought against Ahmadi Muslims in Pakistan under section 295C, which carries the death penalty upon conviction.
BACKGROUND
In May 1992, Nasir Ahmad, an Ahmadi Muslim, had wedding invitation cards printed for the wedding of his daughter. The cards contained traditional Islamic terms and prayers.
The ceremony wedding place on May 15, 1992. The following day the head of the local Khatam e Nubawwat organization, Mehr Shaukat Ali, lodged a complaint against Nasi Ahmad and twelve others at the local police station.
He alleged that the accused had committed an offense by printing Islamic terms on the wedding cards. The offending terms were:
CHARGES
The local police registered a case against thirteen persons under Sections 298C and 295C. 298C carries up to three years imprisonment. Section 295C carries the death penalty. The provision for life imprisonment was struck down by the Federal Shariat Court and so now the only possible sentence under 295C is death.
All those whose names appeared on the weddding cards as invitees were charged. These include a 9 month old infant, Shah Sikander Bakht, and three non-Ahmadis.
Nasir Ahmad and his son Babar were arrested on May 17. Babar was later released; the bail application of Nasir Ahmad was rejected by the magistrate. The sessions court also rejected his bail application.
The appeal on behalf of Nasir Ahmad was fixed for July 14. The bail of the three non-Ahmadis and two women was accepted and the judgment on the other pleas was reserved. Later, they were rejected. The Lahore High Court ruled that the terms on the wedding card defiled the Prophet of Islam.
A leave to appeal was filed on August 6. On August 10, a judge of the Supreme Court, Justice A.S. Salaam granted bail to all Ahmadis in both cases. Nasir Ahmad was released from jail after 86 days.
PROSECUTION'S CASE
In the case that followed, the Advocate General charged the accused with three crimes:
-
The accused had deliberately and maliciously used the Islamic expressions on the wedding cards to outrage the religious feelings of Muslims and so had committed an offense under 295A, punishable with 10 years.
The accused had used expressions which directly or indirectly implied that he was a Muslim. This offense is punishable by 3 years under 298C.
Mr Farooq Haider, Additional Advocate General stated:
"Our patience has reached its limits and we are only tolerating these people in this country"
COURT'S DECISION
The Supreme Court observed:
After hearing the learned counsel for the parties at length, we find that a serious question which requires examination is whether defiling takes place exfacie by the written or spoken words or the act of the person accused of the offence is to be seen keeping in view the totality of the milieu, including necessarily the faith, the intention, the object, and the background of the person using them. We have got the impression prima facie that exfacie use of these expressions does not create in a Muslim, or for that matter anyone else, any of the feelings of hurt, offense or provocation etc etc, nor is it derogatory to the Holy Prophet, peace be upon him, or Muslims. It is only when the person reading or hearing them goes into the deep background of the person using them and brings his own special knowledge of the faith, beliefs and latent intentions of such an accused, that the alleged results are likely to follow. |
The Supreme Court held that in view of the serious questions arising out of the application and a possible death sentence, an authoritive ruling is called for at the trial. The Court set aside the ruling of the Lahore High Court and the interim bail of Nasir Ahmad was confirmed.
|
 |